![]() Just an aside: it's still seriously disturbing how an entire part of human existence and the continuation of it can so easily be labeled, often times falsely with the word "porn" while the wanton destruction, blood-letting, maiming, gutting and goring of it for equal pleasure and entertainment such as: FPS gaming, slasher and ultra-violent movies, modern "sports" like UFC and MMA, repeated dwelling on the human frailty to go to war to solve differences, etc. To be perfectly honest, I just hate the word and most of all, the misuse and misunderstanding of it. so then should it also be considered "porn"? Just about anything can be "erotic", whether a tree, a glade, the oceans, or tea cup. While for some it may be "erotic" due to the overt human eroticism on display, it's also stimulating the very same chemical responses in the brain when viewing just the landscapes for many others. That a spontaneous idea formed to mate the raw beauty of aerial landscapes with the equally raw beauty of human nature, is nothing new nor pornographic, yet it is "erotic" in nature (no pun intended). The definition points to you being partially correct. The world is a bigger, complicated, and often times better place than to project geographic theological "mores" an all of it.Įver been to Europe or the jungles of the Amazon? Two disparate places that also have "societies" that don't lend themselves to outside propaganda (or have ever heard any of it) to label the beauty of the human body, it's functions, and it's desires with such a disparaging and all-encompassing label like "porn".Ģ) Definition of pornography: the depiction of **erotic behavior** (as in pictures or writing) intended to cause sexual excitement. ![]() are we talking about? I sincerely hope not the majority preceded with "moral". "That said, given our society **has agreed, by majority** that such mores are expected and preferred, what we see here is **nothing more than porn.**"ġ) which society. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |